Which element is NOT typically included in the criteria for approving CE programs?

When evaluating Continuing Education (CE) programs, certain criteria are essential for ensuring that the education provided is effective and relevant to the field of vector control. Instructor qualifications are critical because they determine whether the individuals teaching the programs have the necessary expertise and knowledge to provide quality training. Program submission requirements help ensure that the content meets established standards and is delivered properly, contributing to the educational value of the CE program. Relevance to vector control is vital, as the CE programs must address current issues in the field, ensuring that participants gain applicable knowledge and skills that contribute to their competency in vector control practices.

Attendance fees, while they may be a factor for participants regarding their ability to enroll, do not impact the educational quality or relevance of the program itself. The financial aspect of attending a course typically does not play a role in the accreditation or approval process for CE programs, focusing instead on the educational content and the qualifications of those delivering it. This is why attendance fees are not typically included as a criterion for approving CE programs.